Justice/OldArchive

From B Nomic

This page contains Consultations from previous eras of B Nomic. These have little relevance to the game now but have been kept as a historical record and because they form part of game custom. The new Archive containing CFJs can be found at Justice/Archive.

This page attempts to gather all information on the Justice proceedings of B Nomic. Unfortunately, as an artifact from Codae's experiment, it is sadly out of date.

Contents 1 Consultations 1.1 Consultation 1 1.2 Consultation 2 1.3 Consultation 3 1.4 Consultation 4 1.5 Consultation 5 1.6 Consultation 6 1.7 Consultation 7 1.8 Consultation 8 1.9 Consultation 9 1.10 Consultation 10 1.11 Consultation 11 1.12 Consultation 12 1.13 Consultation 13 1.14 Consultation 14 1.15 Consultation 15 1.16 Consultation 16 1.17 Consultation 17 1.18 Consultation 18 1.18.1 Question 1.18.2 Supplicant's reasoning 1.18.3 Answer 1.19 Consultation 19 1.20 Consultation 20 1.20.1 Question 1.20.2 Answer 1.20.3 Priest's Reasoning 1.21 Consultation 21 1.21.1 Question 1.21.2 Supplicant's reasoning 1.21.3 Answer 1.21.4 Priest's Reasoning 1.22 Consultation 22 1.22.1 Question 1.22.2 Answer 1.23 Consultation 23 1.23.1 Question 1.23.2 Answer 1.24 Consultation 24 1.24.1 Question 1.24.2 Answer 1.25 Consultation 25 1.25.1 Question 1.25.2 Answer 1.26 Consultation 26 1.26.1 Question 1.26.2 Answer 1.27 Consultation 27 1.27.1 Question 1.27.2 Answer 1.28 Consultation 28 1.28.1 Question 1.28.2 Answer 1.29 Consultation 29 1.29.1 Question 1.29.2 Answer 1.30 Consultation 30 1.30.1 Question 1.30.2 Answer 1.31 Consultation 31 1.31.1 Question 1.31.2 Answer 1.32 Consultation 32 1.32.1 Question 1.32.2 Answer 1.33 Consultation 33 1.33.1 Question 1.33.2 Answer 1.34 Consultation 34 1.34.1 Question 1.34.2 Answer 1.35 Consultation 35 1.35.1 Question 1.35.2 Answer 1.36 Consultation 68 1.36.1 Question 1.36.2 Answer 1.37 Consultation 36 1.37.1 Question 1.37.2 Answer 1.38 Consultation 37 1.38.1 Question 1.38.2 Answer 1.39 Consultation 38 1.39.1 Question 1.39.2 Answer 1.40 Consultation 39 1.40.1 Question 1.40.2 Answer 1.41 Consultation 40 1.41.1 Question 1.41.2 Answer 1.42 Consultation 41 1.42.1 Question 1.42.2 Answer 1.43 Consultation 42 1.43.1 Question 1.43.2 Answer 1.44 Consultation 43 1.44.1 Question 1.44.2 Answer 1.45 Consultation 44 1.45.1 Question 1.45.2 Answer 1.46 Consultation 45 1.46.1 Question 1.46.2 Answer 1.47 Consultation 46 1.47.1 Question 1.47.2 Answer 1.48 Consultation 47 1.48.1 Question 1.48.2 Answer 1.49 Consultation 48 1.49.1 Question 1.49.2 Answer 1.50 Consultation 49 1.50.1 Question 1.50.2 Answer 1.51 Consultation 50 1.51.1 Question 1.51.2 Answer 1.52 Consultation 51 1.52.1 Question 1.52.2 Answer 1.53 Consultation 52 1.53.1 Question 1.53.2 Answer 1.54 Consultation 53 1.54.1 Question 1.54.2 Answer 1.55 Consultation 54 1.55.1 Question 1.55.2 Answer 1.56 Consultation 55 1.56.1 Question 1.56.2 Answer 1.57 Consultation 56 1.57.1 Question 1.57.2 Answer 1.58 Consultation 57 1.58.1 Question 1.58.2 Answer 1.59 Consultation 58 1.59.1 Question 1.59.2 Answer 1.60 Consultation 59 1.60.1 Question 1.60.2 Answer 1.61 Consultation 60 1.61.1 Question 1.61.2 Answer 1.62 Consultation 61 1.62.1 Question 1.62.2 Answer 1.63 Consultation 62 1.63.1 Question 1.63.2 Answer 1.64 Consultation 63 1.64.1 Question 1.64.2 Answer 1.65 Consultation 64 1.65.1 Question 1.65.2 Answer 1.66 Consultation 65 1.66.1 Question 1.66.2 Answer 1.67 Consultation 66 1.67.1 Question 1.67.2 Answer 1.68 Consultation 67 1.68.1 Question 1.68.2 Answer 1.69 Consultation 69 1.69.1 Question 1.69.2 Answer 1.70 Consultation i 1.70.1 Question 1.70.2 Answer 1.71 Consultation 70 1.71.1 Question 1.71.2 Answer 1.72 Consultation 2*i 1.72.1 Question 1.72.2 Answer 1.73 Consultation 3*i 1.73.1 Question 1.73.2 Answer 1.74 Consultation 71 1.74.1 Question 1.74.2 Answer 1.75 Consultation 72 1.75.1 Question 1.75.2 Answer 1.76 Consultation 73 1.76.1 Question 1.76.2 Answer 1.77 Consultation 74 1.77.1 Question 1.77.2 Answer 1.78 Consultation 75 1.78.1 Question 1.78.2 Reasoning 1.78.3 Answer 1.79 Consultation 76 1.79.1 Question 1.79.2 Unbeliever 1.79.3 Answer 1.80 Consultation 77 1.80.1 Question 1.80.2 Answer 1.81 Consultation 78 1.81.1 Question 1.81.2 Unbeliever 1.81.3 Answer 1.82 Consultation 79 1.82.1 Question 1.82.2 Answer 1.83 Consultation 125 1.83.1 Question 1.83.2 Answer 1.84 Consultation 126 1.84.1 Question 1.84.2 Answer 1.85 Consultation 127 1.86 Consultation 128 1.87 Consultation 129 1.88 Consultation 130 1.89 Consultation 131 1.90 Consultation 132 1.91 Consultation 133 1.92 Consultation 134 1.93 Consultation 135 1.94 Consultation 136 1.95 Consultation 137 1.96 Consultation 138 1.97 Consultation 139 1.98 Consultation 140 1.99 Consultation 141 1.100 Consultation 142 1.101 Consultation 143 1.102 Consultation 144 1.103 Consultation 145 1.104 Consultation 146 1.105 Consultation 147 1.106 Consultation 148 1.107 Consultation 149 1.108 Consultation 150 1.109 Consultation 151 1.110 Consultation 152 1.111 Consultation 153 1.112 Consultation 154 1.113 Consultation 155 1.114 Consultation 156 1.115 Consultation 157 1.116 Consultation 158 1.117 Consultation 159 1.118 Consultation 160 1.119 Consultation 161 1.120 Consultation 162 1.121 Consultation 163 1.122 Consultation 164 1.123 Consultation 165 1.124 Consultation 166 1.125 Consultation 167 1.126 Consultation 168 1.127 Consultation 169 1.128 Consultation 170 1.129 Consultation 171 1.130 Consultation 172 1.131 Consultation 173 1.132 Consultation 178 1.133 Consultation 179 1.134 Consultation 180 1.135 Consultation 181 1.136 Consultation 182 1.137 Consultation 183 1.138 Consultation 184 1.139 Consultation 185 1.140 Consultation 186 1.141 Consultation 187 1.142 Consultation 9999+i 1.143 Consultation 189 1.144 Consultation 190 1.145 Consultation 191 1.146 Consultation 192 1.147 Consultation 193

Consultations

Consultation 1

is it correct for Peter to assign himself 10 points for being the rule tag moderator on a day different from nday 1 ?

Answered TRUE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 2

Is it valid for an element change action to be submitted privately to the rule tag moderator?

Answered: TRUE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 3

Supposing a consultation is answered on nday 12, if the clock becomes stopped on nday 2, then does the consultation become pondered when the ndelay becomes 2 ?

Answered TRUE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 4

Supposing a player X sent a message to a public forum stating "the player known as X is the Administrator of B Nomic", would player X become the Administrator ?

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 5

If all Game Objects other than the Rules and the Player named Wonko were destroyed, would it be possible for me (the Supplicant of this Consultation) to become a Player?

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 6

Is there a Consultation with a Question of: {{a forum is invalid if it does not allow players to communicate.}}?

Answered TRUE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 7

A forum is invalid if it does not allow Players to communicate. True or False?

Answered FALSE, reversed, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 8

Public fora may not be designated via a game action. True or false?

Answered TRUE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 9

All Proposals created since Rule 2-2 was last amended have Proposal Numbers of null. True or false?

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 10

If all Game Objects other than the Player named Wonko were destroyed, would it be possible for me (the Supplicant of this Consultation) to become a Player?

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 11

True or false: Is Primo Corporation a player?

Answered TRUE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 12

Is a cooperation a single entity, capable of passing the Turing test?

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 13

True of false: Consultation #12 does not serve to prevent a corporation from becoming a player because it specifies that said corporation must pass "the Turing Test" instead of "a Turing Test"?

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 14

True or false: A Player need not be capable of passing a Turing Test in order to remain a player.

Answered TRUE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 15

The rules of B Nomic allow BobTHJ to act on behalf of the group of persons knows as "Primo Corporation", True of False ?

• Assigned to: Zach

False, Pondered ( full info)

Consultation 16

True or False: The Administrator (or other ruling or governing body) may cause an External Force which is also a Player to no longer be a Player if said Player can no longer meet the requirements to become a Player.

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 17

Supposing there are two Players, say A and B, where A is a single human being and B is a group of human beings that contains A, then if A and B vote for the same proposal only the most recent vote is counted. True or false ?

Answered FALSE, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 18

• Supplicant: Antonio

Question

true or false: there exists a proposal numbered 105 ?

Supplicant's reasoning

I don't think that Zach's "fastness" proposal ever reached the public forum.

Answer

True, pondered ( full info)

Consultation 19

Empty (was submitted only to discussion forum)

Consultation 20

• Supplicant: bd_
• Assigned to: The Dave

Question

Is an organization or other group consisting of one human being, and behaving as that person orders, exactly equivalent to that person for the purposes of B Nomic?

Answer

TRUE, pondered

Priest's Reasoning

If the organization only has one human being as its membership, outside the context of B Nomic (and outside of most contexts except maybe the tax codes) that organization and its sole member would be considered equivalent.

This looks like a loophole begging to be exploited, but I don't believe this to be the case - if a one-member organization is equivalent to its sole member, then one cannot have multiple "voices" in B Nomic. (Rule 1-4 presently specifies that an External Force wishing to join may not already be a Player; if the human being is already playing, eir organization of one cannot join, and vice versa.)

The issue of multiple players combining to form an organization, thus gaining an unfair amount of representation within B Nomic, still exists, but it is not the subject of this consultation.

( full info)

Consultation 21

• Supplicant: Wonko
• Priest: Zach

Question

Humans cannot join B Nomic. True or False?

Supplicant's reasoning

One requirement for joining the game is that you be able to "pass the Turing Test". However, "the Turing Test" is clearly defined as a specific test for determining whether an artificial intelligence can successfully masquerade as a human. It follows that the only way a player can join is if e can demonstrate that e is A) an artificial intelligence, and B) indistinguishable from a human. However, if B) is true, then by definition there is no way to demonstrate A. It follows that nobody can become a player.

It nearly follows that there are no players and thus no game. However, several nyears ago a rule was created called the Statute of Limitations that retroactively legalized any statement made by the Administrator after 10 ndays passed with no objections. The Administrator (David E. Smith, at the time) referred to my existence as a player numerous times during this period. As I am the only player who has been playing continuously since before the repeal of the Statute of Limitations, it follows that I am currently the only player of B Nomic.

Answer

False, pondered ( full info)

Priest's Reasoning

Hmm. I would say that this is "TRUE" EXCEPT that recently my "Turing Test Disambiguation" passed. So, at the time that this was asked, the answer was TRUE, but the answer is now FALSE.

Which brings up a dilemma. Assuming that: A) at the time that this consultation was submitted, Humans could not join B.Nomic, and B) I am a human, and C) all-but-one of the voting populace of the Nomic are human (we have one self-willed non-human, last I checked), and D) Humans NEVER WERE able to join B.Nomic (explanation below) then no one (except for our non-human self-willed organism) has ever joined, By this logic, no rules have ever passed. Also by this logic, neither the supplicant, Oracle, nor I are players, so this email doesn't need to be written.

So, for the sake of everyone's sanity, I say that Humans ARE NOW and HAVE ALWAYS BEEN able to join this game.

My (final) answer is FALSE.

Consultation 22

• Supplicant: Antonio

Question

The Oracle (as of the time of this consultation) is Antonio

Answer

ZOTTED. ( full info)

Consultation 23

Supplicant: Zach

Priest: Peter

Question

Can the answer to a consultation have multiple answers (IE, the answer is sometimes TRUE and sometimes FALSE)?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 24

Supplicant: Zach

Question

Who is the current Rulekeeper (as mentioned in Rule 1-8, and nowhere else)?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 25

Submitted by: Zach

Priest: BobTHJ

Question

There is no current rulekeeper, as mentioned in rule 1-8 and not defined in the rules. True or false?

Answer

FALSE, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 26

Submitted by: Wooble

Priest: Antonio

Question

True or False: The Minister of Change's first set of results, discounting Primo's votes, are effective and eir second set of results, counting said votes, is ineffective.

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 27

Question

Is Primo Corporation a Faction?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 28

Question

Is Primo Corporation a Player?

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 29

Question

True or False: Any Player may join the faction Primo Corp regardless of the published rules by which Primo Corp is governed.

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 30

Question

True or False: a piece of paper can consent to X if a human being has written on the piece of paper "I consent to X".

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 31

Question

Prior to Consultations 27 & 28 becoming pondered Primo Corporation was a Player.

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 32

Question

Primo Corpotation never took any action that would forfeit its status as a Player nor did any other game action or rule cause Primo Corporation to cease to be a player.

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 33

Question

Primo Corporation never took any action that would cause it to become a Faction as per rule 5-2

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 34

Question

Agora is a Faction.

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 35

Question

Is the Blueprint for the Device named the "Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch" invalid because it had no authority to define Powers for the Device?

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 68

Question

In the event that a particular Game Action, which may be taken only without a certain number of Objections within a certain period of time, is successfully performed without said number of Objections, is this Game Action considered to have been performed at the time when it reached a Public Forum, or at the end of the Objection period?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 36

Question

Is a miniministry automatically vacated at the end of each nweek?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 37

Question

Can the Clock be started when a miniministry is vacant?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 38

Question

Are the two previous consultations currently known as Consultations 37 and 38 valid? [[Oracle's Note: Supplicant is referring to Consultations 36 and 37.]]

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 39

Question

Can the Association of Federated Organizations submit a Consultation?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 40

Question

In B Nomic, does explicit consent to being governed by an Agreement have to take place within B Nomic?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 41

Question

Is the MediaWiki software an Outsider?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 42

Question

The AFO is both a Player and a Faction at the same time, true or false?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 43

Question

There exists a Blueprint for a Cudgel and no Blueprint for a Rapier.

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 44

Question

Registrar Wooble does not have the power to allow Agora to become a player by Rule 1-4

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 45

Question

Is it true that any player can define a blueprint?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 46

Question

Can a player, other than the Artisan, own one or several blueprints?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 47

Question

Does a device (unique or not) need a corresponding, existing blueprint to be defined?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 48

Question

Can a game Object be both a Player and a Faction?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 49

Question

Does Registrar Wooble have the power to refuse Agora as a player by Rule 1-4?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 50

Question

Are Hose and Wooble the same entity?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 51

Question

If the Registrar attempts to refuse to allow an External Force to become a player after it has already become a player, does it thereby cease to be a player?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 52

Question

The AFO is a valid Faction as well as a player.

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 53

Question

Is "Dice Server" a Player?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 54

Question

Are there any rules for the game of B Nomic?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 55

Question

Is there a paradox with a Player being an Object?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 56

Question

Does the Panic Button belonging to the Player named Goethe have "X" written on it as of the time of submission of this Consultation?

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 57

Question

Is the Panic Button belonging to the Player named Wonko On as of the time of submission of this Consultation?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 58

Question

Is the Panic Button belonging to the Player named pikhq On as of the time of submission of this Consultation?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 59

Question

I write "X" on my Panic Button. is valid.

Answer

Zotted

( full info)

Consultation 60

Question

I give my Panic Button to Goethe. is valid.

Answer

Zotted

( full info)

Consultation 61

Question

I give my Panic Button to Wonko. is valid.

Answer

Zotted

( full info)

Consultation 62

Question

I press pikhq's Panic Button, turning it On. is valid.

Answer

Zotted

( full info)

Consultation 63

Question

Should the above Consultations, based on the Rules, be ZOTTED?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 64

Question

Question: Is it permissible to make any game actions?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 65

Question

Question: Is it permissible to go into a state of emergency?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 66

Question

Question: Is it permissible to answer a consultation?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 67

Question

Question: Is declaring Consultations 64, 65, and 66 for being irrelevant or otherwise unworthy valid?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 69

Question

Question: Does the Game Action of declaring a past Game Action invalid and thus causing it to have never happened require or force a retroactive change to the game state?

Answer

False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation i

Question

Consultation 64: To turn one's Panic Button On if it is Off, or otherwise to turn it Off, is valid.

Answer

Zotted

( full info)

Consultation 70

Question

To spend 10 trout to purchase a yellow-orange Jester's Cap is valid.

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 2*i

Question

Does submitting or answering Consultation 70 count as "doing anything with trouts?"

Answer

Zotted

Consultation 3*i

Question

Does sending this message count as "doing anything with trouts?"

Answer

Zotted

Consultation 71

Question

Does there exist a rule named "Rules"?

Answer

Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 72

Question

Was Wooble a Player at the time this Consultation was submitted?

Answer

True, Waiting

(full info)

Consultation 73

Question

Is it possible to truthfully say that the Priest's answer to this Consultation will be in the affirmative, as of the time of submission of this Consultation?

Answer

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 74

Question

Is Murphy a player?

Answer

Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 75

Question

Is there a Player whose name is Wooble?

Reasoning

When Wooble reregistered, he specified the nickname Wooble. The Rules state that a joining Player must specify a uniquely identifying name.

Answer

True, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 76

Question

At the start of nday 10 of nweek 135, would it have been possible for the Rulekeeper to move Rule 3-13 into a different section of the Rules?

Unbeliever

0x44

Answer

Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 77

Question

The mailing list at spoon-notices@nomic.net is a Private Forum.

Answer

True, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 78

Question

The rule identified as 6-8 at the time of this consultation's submission was amended by proposal number 219.

Unbeliever

Hose

Answer

True, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 79

Question

Is the Ministry of Society a Game Object as of the time of submission of this Consultation?

Answer

Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 125

Question

In the case of a paradox in following the rules (e.g. a rule cannot be followed, because it would be against a rule to do so) is there a rule-defined course of action?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 126

Question

Is Charles currently the Minister of Law?

Answer

True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 127

Question: Is Wooble a Player?

Answer: True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 128

Question: Is the OCB the Game Object representing the projection into B Nomic of Agora's Beast?

Answer: FALSE, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 129

Question: Does a Priest's Answer of YES, NO, or PARADOX to a Consultation assigned to him have any effect on the game after the Consultation has become pondered, assuming there were not more claims of Inconsistency than claims of Consistency?

Answer: True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 130

Question: At the time of submission of this consultation, is the player named Charles the only player with a Baby Blue sock?

Answer: True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 131

Question: Is it true that, since the time proposal 485 Passed, C Nomic has been identical to B Nomic?

Answer: True, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 132

Question: Is a ZIP file a legal Game Document?

Answer: Maybe, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 133

Question: Did comex, within the first 2 hours (UTC) of October 10th, 2008, submit a Transaction to spoon-business which read, in its entirety (please ignore spacing and returns): {{The name of the game is C Nomic. I forfeit the game.}} ?

Answer: ZOTted

( full info)

Consultation 134

Question: Has ehird violated Section 3 of the Contract of Epimenides?

Answer: ZOTted

( full info)

Consultation 135

Question: Are parties bound by the plaintext of contracts whose stated text is in some sort of encrypted form?

Answer: No, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 136

Question: Does an otherwise legal action that purports to "retroactively simulate" something have any effect on the gamestate?

Answer: False, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 137

Question: Are the Officers of CPA2 obligated to remove the restrictions on mackerel transfers imposed by cTC?

ZOTted

( full info)

Consultation 138

Question: Does comex's Corporation (his first one), at the time of this Consultation's submission, possess m50?

Answer: No, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 139

Question: If a player is assigned a fine in macks (thus enabling em to destroy that number of macks), is e thus able to destroy macks e does not own?

Answer: No, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 140

Question: Are Private Fora Game Objects?

Answer: Yes, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 141

Question: Is Hillary Rodham Clinton a Legal Entity, either as an External Force or as an Outsider?

Answer: No, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 142

Question: Are all players paranoid?

Answer: No, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 143

Question: Is it currently Winday?

Answer: ZOTTED ( full info)

Consultation 144

Question: Did Monstrou become a player on or about Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:13:26 -0800?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 145

Question: Does Monstrou's consent constitute "Monstrous Consent" for the purpose of Rule 4E88 and/or 5E88 (The Monster)?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 146

Question: Is the mailing list at spoon-business@nomic.net a Public Forum for B Nomic?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 147

Question: Is the Operantly Conditioned Beast a Player?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 148

Question: Presuming one corporation (hereafter called Party A) is an officer of another corporation, when Party A becomes obligated to perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract, is that Game Action performed as if Party A had sent it to the public forum?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 149

Question: Does SafeCorp (the version that ehird created and joined on or about Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:46:42 +0000) obligate any player to perform any unambiguous Game Action?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 150

Question: Can mental states be altered in a transaction?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 151

Question: Is Wooble a PEP?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 152

Question: Did Era 5 start?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 153

Question: Is Charles on Square (0,0) ?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 154

Question: Is Codae the validly-assigned Priest for Consultations 152 and 153?

Answer: ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 155

Question: Did Jay violate the rules by turning the clock on in the above-quoted message?

Answer: Yes, Pondered

Punishment: 10 macks

( full info)

Consultation 156

Question: At the time of this Consultation's submission, is it currently nday 2?

Answer: Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 157

Question: There is a Player that is not a Bum.

Answer: Yes, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 158

Question: Did JamesB violate Rule 5E38 by posting commercial spam to the Public Forum in the above-quoted message and elsewhere?

Answer: No, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 159

Question: Is the answer to this consultation NO?

Answer: Paradox, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 160

Question: Is the MoM ever allowed to turn the Clock On?

Answer: Yes, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 161

Question: Does the question from Consultation 159 have to do with a matter of interpretation of the rules?

Answer: No, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 162

Question: Did Warrigal have at least m10000 when this Consultation was submitted?

Answer: Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 163

Question: Does teucer have any mackerel?

Answer: Yes, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 164

Question: Are mackerel fungible?

Answer: Yes, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 165

Question: Does there exist a square with the color (255,255,255)?

Answer: Yes, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 166

Question: Were any mackerel successfully destroyed by the Pencil Sharpener?

Answer: No, Pondered

( full info)

Consultation 167

Question: Did the Pencil Sharpener do anything at all?

Answer: No, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 168

Question: Are the answers to Pondered Consultations correct, after the Consultations become Pondered?

Answer: No, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 169

Question: Do the answers to Pondered Consultations become correct when the Consultations become Pondered?

Answer: No, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 170

Question: Do Pondered Consultations create precedents that affect how to accurately judge other Consultations?

Answer: Yes, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 171

Question: Ten seconds before the Clock most recently became On, was the MoM allowed to turn it on?

Answer: No, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 172

Question: The e-mail entitled "ram" (sent by ehird) is spam. ehird is therefore in contravention of Rule 58.

Answer: Yes, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 173

Question: Are ndays Game Objects?

Answer: No, Waiting

( full info)

Consultation 178

Question: Can players submit Tweaks by posting them to a Public Forum?

ZOTTED

( full info)

Consultation 179

Question: Is an e-mail address described to a person by specifying domain and MD5 checksum, but not account name (e.g. describing cabal@jaycampbell.com as "the address at jaycampbell.com with MD5 checksum 4dcd83b0338eaee8e8f8196f34095d18"), reasonably accessible to that person (as required of Emergency Fora by Rule 5E0)?

Answer: Yes, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 180

Question:

>> I intend, without objection, to

>> nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjk.

Is the above quoted message spam?

Answer: No, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 181

Question: Did j violate the rules by failing to destroy his m10 fine punishment in a Jiffy?

Answer: Yes, bail of m50, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 182

Question: Did comex break the rules by submitting the contract "Suffocation"?

Answer:

( full info)

Consultation 183

Question: Are there Active Players, other than comex, in the Game of B Nomic?

Answer: Yes, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 184

Question: Are there any Mackerel formerly owned by ehird?

Answer: No, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 185

Question: Are the Mackerel formerly owned by ehird now owned by Nobody?

ZOTTED.

( full info)

Consultation 186

Question: Did Warrigal violate any of his obligations under the Ministry of Questions?

Answer: No, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 187

Question: Did j violate the rules by turning the clock on?

Answer: Yes, Bail of m25 and a Term of one nweek, Pondered.

( full info)

Consultation 9999+i

Question: Is the External Force formerly known as ehird still a Player?

Answer: False, Waiting.

( full info)

Consultation 189

Question: Is it true that consultations have the power to affect the gamestate, once they have been Pondered?

Answer: Waiting.

( full info)

Consultation 190

Question: Is Fred an External Force?

Answer: Yes, Waiting.

( full info)

Consultation 191

Question: Is it possible for a Player to forfeit in the past, by submitting in the present a message that he does so?

Answer: Yes, Waiting.

( full info)

Consultation 192

Question: May a Player now submit a tweak?

ZOTTED.

( full info)

Consultation 193

Question: Did J destroy all of the game's mackerel save his own?

Answer: No, Waiting.

( full info)